References

Brache V, Cochon L, Duijkers IJM A prospective, randomized, pharmacodynamic study of quick-starting a desogestrel progestin-only pill following ulipristal acetate for emergency contraception. Hum Reprod. 2015; 30:2785-2793 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev241

Cheng L, Che Y, Gülmezoglu AM. Interventions for emergency contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 8 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001324.pub4

Cleland K, Zhu H, Goldstuck N The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27:1994-2000

Díaz S Lactational amenorrhea and the recovery of ovulation and fertility in fully nursing Chilean women. Contraception. 1988; 38:53-67

Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. FSRH Clinical Guidance Emergency Contraception. 2017. http://www.fsrh.org (accessed 26 April 2020)

Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. Drug Interactions with Hormonal Contraception. 2017. http://www.fsrh.org/standards-and-guidance/documents/ceu-clinical-guidance-drug-interactions-with-hormonal/ (accessed 26 April 2020)

Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. Contraception for Women Aged Over 40. 2010. http://www.fsrh.org/documents/cec-ceu-guidance-womenover40-jul-2010/ (accessed 26 April 2020)

Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. United Kingdom Medical Eligibility Criteria Contraception. 2016. http://www.fsrh.org (accessed 26 April 2020)

FSRH CEU statement on antibiotic cover for urgent insertion of intrauterine contraception in women at high risk of STI. 2019. http://www.fsrh.org (accessed 26.4.20)

Glasier AF, Cameron ST, Fine PM Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010; 375:555-562 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60101-8

Halpern V, Raymond EG, Lopez LM. Repeated use of pre- and postcoital hormonal contraception for prevention of pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 1 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd007595.pub3

Jatlaoui TC, Riley H, Curtis KM. Safety data for levonorgestrel, ulipristal acetate and Yuzpe regimens for emergency contraception. Contraception. 2015; 93:93-112 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.11.001

Jesam C, Cochon L, Salvatierra AM A prospective, open-label, multicenter study to assess the pharmacodynamics and safety of repeated use of 30 mg ulipristal acetate. Contraception. 2016; 93:310-316 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.015

Knight J Complete Guide to Fertility Awareness, 1st edn. Oxford: Routledge; 2017

Li HWR, Lo SST, Ng EHY Efficacy of ulipristal acetate for emergency contraception and its effect on the subsequent bleeding pattern when administered before or after ovulation. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31:1200-1207 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew055

Noé G, Croxatto HB, Salvatierra AM Contraceptive efficacy of emergency contraception with levonorgestrel given before or after ovulation. Contraception. 2011; 84:486-492 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.015

Phillips SJ, Tepper NK, Kapp N Progestogen-only contraceptive use among breastfeeding women: a systematic review. Contraception. 2016; 94:226-252 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.09.010

Polakow-Farkash S, Gilad O, Merlob P Levonorgestrel used for emergency contraception during lactation – a prospective observational cohort study on maternal and infant safety. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013; 26:219-221 https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2012.722730

Rodriguez MI, Curtis KM, Gaffield ML Advance supply of emergency contraception: a systematic review. Contraception. 2013; 87:590-601 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.09.011

Zhang L, Chen J, Wang Y Pregnancy outcome after levonorgestrel-only emergency contraception failure: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2009; 24:1605-1611 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep076

Common questions on emergency and postcoital contraception

02 June 2020
Volume 31 · Issue 6

Abstract

There are a number of key questions that must be asked when considering the method of emergency or postcoital contraception to use. Alison J Vaughan examines these when choosing from the three treatments available in the UK

Copper IUD (CU-IUD), Levonorgestrel (LNG-EC), Ulipristal Acetate Emergency Contraception (UPA-EC) are the three methods of emergency contraception (EC) available in the UK. CU-IUD is the most effective method and must be offered to all women requesting emergency contraception and that offer documented in the record. UPA is more effective than LNG but the efficacy of UPA can be affected by on-going contraception, so is not always the ideal method for all women (see Figure 1). A consultation for EC offers the opportunity to discuss on going contraception and sexual health. Comprehensive evidence-led guidance can be found in the EC clinical guideline, published by the Clinical Effectiveness Committee of Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (FSRH) in 2017.

Emergency contraception (EC) is defined as a contraceptive method that is administered after sexual intercourse but has its effects before implantation (considered to occur no earlier than five days after ovulation).

Though EC is no substitute for effective regular contraception, EC can provide a valuable option for women who are at risk of pregnancy following a problem with their usual contraceptive method or unprotected sexual intercourse (UPSI). There are three methods of EC available in the UK. This article describes the features of each and which is most appropriate in any given clinical situation.

What are the side effects of emergency contraception?

A systemic review of safety data (Jatlaoui et al, 2015) for adverse events relating to use of EC in healthy women concludes that such events are rare.

Headache, nausea and dysmenorrhea have been reported in about 10% of users of Ulipristal Acetate Ella (UPA-EC)and Levonorgestrel (LNG-EC). It is important to advise the woman that if she vomits within three hours of taking oral EC, a repeat dose is required. After taking oral EC, menses can be delayed. However, if the period is delayed by more than seven days, a pregnancy test should be advised.

What about the risk of sexually transmitted infections in emergency insertions of copper IUD?

A sexual history and chlamydia screening should be carried out on all patients attending for Copper IUD (CU-IUD). CU-IUD insertion risks causing or exacerbating pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) so STI risk should be judged from the history. If the woman is not in a high-risk group (monogamous plus no recent partner change and can be contacted if the sexually transmitted infection (STI) screen gives a positive results) routine antibiotic prophylaxis is not required.

If a woman has known symptomatic chlamydia infection or current gonorrhoea infection then ideally antibiotic treatment should be completed prior to insertion of a CU-IUD. However, the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (FSRH) in its statement on antibiotic cover for emergency CU-IUD 2019 states:

‘If, immediate insertion of a CU-IUD for emergency contraception is required, IUD insertion with antibiotic cover could be considered. Clinical judgment based on the nature and severity of symptoms and discussion with the woman is required.’

If the woman has asymptomatic chlamydia infection, then insertion of a CU-IUD for EC may be considered after discussion with the woman regarding risk and benefits. Treatment with appropriate antibiotics should be given at the time of insertion. Prophylactic antibiotics should be considered in a woman who is considered at risk of an STI but whose results are unavailable, especially if she cannot easily be contacted with the result. Post-insertion, inform the patinet about symptoms that should alert them to infection, such as pelvic pain, dyspareunia, abnormal or offensive vaginal discharge, and where to seek help.

What about breast cancer?

UPA-EC or LNG-EC may be used by women at risk of breast cancer or breast cancer recurrence who decline emergency placement of CU-IUD.

The prognosis for women with breast cancer may affected by hormonal contraception. However, LNG and UPA are UKMEC 2 (United Kingdom Medical Eligibility Criteria for contraception, 2016), because their benefits outweigh the risks and an adverse effect is exceptionally unlikely with such short term exposure. The best option is still CU-IUD because of its increased efficacy (FSRH, 2016).

If emergency contraception fails, what are the risks?

There is no evidence of an adverse pregnancy outcome or foetal abnormality if pregnancy occurs despite use of LNG-EC or UPA-EC. Use of EC does not affect a woman's long term fertility.


Table 1. Methods of emergency contraception
Copper IUD Ulipristal Acetate Ella One®30 mg stat Levonorgestrel Levonelle 1500® 1.5 mg stat
Timing
  • Up to 5 days after first UPSI in a cycle or up to 5 days after earliest calculated day of ovulation (Cleland et al, 2012)
Mode of action
  • Inhibits fertilisation by toxic effect on sperm and ova
  • Cu-IUD causes an endometrial inflammatory reaction that prevents implantation of a fertilised embryo.
  • Selective progesterone receptor modulator
  • Delays ovulation for at least 5 days. Works even after the start of the Luteinising hormone surge. No evidence this works if given after ovulation
  • Inhibits ovulation for the next 5 days
  • Becomes ineffective in the late follicular phase. No evidence this works if given after ovulation
Efficacy
  • Almost 100%
  • Overall pregnancy rate 1−2%
  • Prevents 60-80% of pregnancies
  • Overall pregnancy rate 0.6−2.6%
Contraindication
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe allergy to a constituent of methods eg copper
  • Ethical objections
  • Markedly distorted uterine cavity
  • Long QT interval on ECG, pulmonary hypertension
  • Between 48 hours and 28 days after childbirth
  • Current Gonorrhoea or symptomatic chlamydia infection or pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe allergy to a constituent of methods eg lactose
  • Acute porphyria
  • Severe asthma inadequately controlled by oral glucocorticoids
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe allergy to a constituent of methods eg lactose
  • Acute porphyria
Breast feeding
  • Small Increased risk of perforation if fitted within 36 weeks of delivery in a breast feeding woman
  • UPA excreted in breast milk. Avoid breast feeding for 1 week after UPA (express and discard milk over that time)
Drug interactions (FSRH Drug interactions with hormonal
  • Unaffected by other medication
  • Enzyme inducing agents taken concurrently or in the preceding month potentially reduce effectiveness of UPA
  • Drugs that increase gastric pH eg proton pumps inhibitors, antacids, and H2 antagonists In theory they reduce the reabsorption of UPA, so offer CU-IUD or LNG
  • Progestogens. Effectiveness could be reduced if patient takes progestogen in the 5 days after taking UPA-EC (Brache et al, 2015)
  • In addition, UPA effectiveness may be reduced (in theory) if woman has taken progestogen prior to UPA
  • Enzyme inducing agents taken concurrently or in the preceding month potentially reduce effectiveness of LNG. However, a single dose of 3 mg can be used off licence, though the effectiveness of this regimen is unknown
Effect of weight/BMI on effectiveness
  • Nil known
  • Less effective for women over 85Kg or BMI over 30 kg/m2. Use CU-IUD or 3 mg LNG
  • Less effective if woman weighs more than 70 kg
  • or BMI is over 26 kg/m2. If CU-IUD or UPA are unacceptable or contraindicated consider using 3 mg LNG for these women
FSRH, 2017

Ectopic pregnancy is not thought to be any more common than in women who have not taken EC (Cheng et al, 2012). Nevertheless, women should be warned to seek advice should they experience pelvic pain. In the unusual event of a continuing pregnancy following IUD insertion, an ultrasound scan should be arranged and the IUD removed.

Some examples of contraceptive failure that would indicate the need for EC

  • Spilt/slipped condom
  • Complete/partial expulsion or removal of IUC (intrauterine contraception) at midcycle
  • IUC threads missing and location of IUC unknown
  • Misplaced diaphragm
  • UPSI more than 14 weeks from previous DMPA (depot medroxyprogesterone acetate) injection or within seven days after late injection
  • UPSI after the contraceptive implant has expired
  • UPSI during and for 28 days after use of liver enzyme inducers in those relying on CHC (combined hormonal contraception), POP (progestogen only pill) or contraceptive implant
  • UPSI at any time from the first missed POP until POP has been correctly taken for at least 48 hours
  • Significant prolongation of hormone free interval (HFI) in CHC user ie by nine days or more. For example, UPSI during HFI and method restarted late by two days or more; patch detached, ring removed or pills muddled during week one and no extra precautions used.

What are the most important areas to cover in a consultation for emergency contraception?

  • Take a menstrual and coital history to see if treatment is necessary. In general, better to treat than to with hold
  • Take a sexual history, remember ‘germs as well as sperms'. Offer an STI screen
  • Discuss all EC methods available, their mode of action, efficacy, risks and side effects. If available use a good leaflet, or text link to Family Planning Association website
  • Offer everyone CU-IUD (unless contraindicated) as this is the most effective method. Document that you have offered this and the patient's response
  • If you are unable to offer CU-IUD, provide oral emergency contraception (in case the IUD cannot be fitted or patient changes her mind) and make necessary referral to a fitter. Ensure you have a clear referral pathways
  • Explore her attitudes to possible failure and continuance of pregnancy
  • Advise importance of a pregnancy test at least three weeks after the last episode of UPSI. Ideally, an early morning sample
  • Advise woman to seek advice if she has pelvic pain or irregular bleeding or malodourous vaginal discharge
  • Provide contact details should vomiting occur within three hours of taking oral EC
  • Discuss quick starting contraception.

Figure 1. Pathway for emergency contraception (Sexual Health Dorset)

Examples of some questions to ask when taking a history

  • When was your last menstrual period?
  • Was the last period unusual in anyway (eg later, lighter, shorter than normal)?
  • What is your shortest and longest cycle length?
  • Which day(s) in the cycle did UPSI occurred?
  • How many hours since first UPSI?
  • What is your current method of contraception?
  • Have you used EC within this cycle?
  • If you have used EC in the past, did you experience any problems?
  • How long have you been with your partner?
  • When did you last have sex with anyone else?

Can hormonal contraception be given more than once in a given cycle?

Yes, because clinically we cannot be certain when ovulation occurs. Halpern et al (2014) suggests that repeated use of either LNG-EC or UPA-EC will not induce abortion if the woman is already pregnant and hence either can be given in the same cycle. However, because circulating progestogen appears to reduce the effectiveness of UPA-EC, LNG-EC is recommended if LNG-EC or any progestogen has been taken within the previous seven days (Lesam et al, 2016). Similarly, with seven days following UPA-EC, repeat UPA-EC and not LNG-EC.

A consultation for repeat emergency contraception may be an opportunity to discuss more effective on going contraception or consider CU-IUD.

Are there any occasions when treatment is not necessary?

  • UPSI before day 21 after childbirth, for all women, whatever the chosen method of infant feeding. However, if the woman is fully breast feeding, has amenorrhea and baby is under six months old, then EC is not required (Diaz, 1988)
  • UPSI before day five after abortion, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy or uterine evacuation for gestational trophoblastic disease
  • The risks of treatment are low and cycles can be variable so better to treat whatever the day of the cycle
  • Patient is aged over 55 years.

Should perimenopausal women be offered EC?

Yes, because despite erratic menses they may still ovulate. Hormone replacement therapy is not contraceptive and could reduce the effectiveness of UPA-EC. For more information see (FSRH). Contraception for Women Aged Over 40. 2010.

Will LNG-EC work if given more than 72 hours after UPSI?

Yes, but not very well. Evidence suggests that LNG-EC is ineffective if taken more than 96 hours after UPSI (Noe 2011)

What should be advised regarding future contraception?

CU-IUD offers immediate on going contraception for its licensed duration. Oral EC methods do not provide ongoing contraception. If ovulation occurs later in the same cycle and UPSI takes place, there is a pregnancy risk. After taking LNG-EC women should be advised to start suitable hormonal contraception immediately and use condoms until that method becomes effective.

Women should be advised to wait five days after taking UPA-EC before starting hormonal contraception. For example, use condoms for a minimum of 48 hours after POP has been immediately restarted and carry out a pregnancy test 21 days later to exclude pregnancy. This is because Brache 2015 has shown that starting desogestrel POP immediately after reduces the ability of UPA-EC to delay ovulation. Studies have not be carried out using other contraceptives, but extrapolating from this evidence Faculty (2017) advises that no hormonal contraception should be used for five days after UPA-EC has been given.

FSRH advise that DMPA and the contraceptive implant can be quick started after LNG-EC or five days after UPA-EC has been given. However, DMPA is not easy to reverse so some women may prefer to defer DMPA until a follow up pregnancy test 21days after UPSI to confirm that the woman is not pregant. LNG-IUS should not be inserted, unless pregnancy can be reasonably excluded.

Women using fertility awareness methods, who choose hormonal EC, should avoid intercourse throughout the first cycle post EC and then restrict intercourse to the late infertile time until regular ovulatory cycles are re-established (Knight, 2017).

Can hormonal EC be supplied in advance of need?

This may be considered in women who rely on barrier contraception or are travelling abroad. Systemic review (Rodriguez, 2013) concluded that, compared with conventional provision, advance provision did not reduce pregnancy rates. If supplied in advance, EC is taken sooner, and does not lead to increased frequency of UPSI or increased risk of STI. However, many women in the trials did not use EC after UPSI despite having a supply.

Useful resources

www.fsrh.org

www.fpa.org.uk

www.fertilityuk.org

Key Points

  • Discuss ALL EC methods available
  • Offer everyone copper IUD (unless contraindicated). Document that you have offered this and the patient's response
  • Discuss and provide ongoing contraception
  • Take a sexual history and consider referral to STI screening services
  • Know pathway to IUD fitter