References

Gordon CA, Utzinger J, Muhi S Strongyloidiasis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024; 10:6 1-16 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-023-00490-x

Jarbøl DE, Rasmussen S, Balasubramaniam K Exploring colorectal cancer patients' diagnostic pathways and general practitioners' assessment of the diagnostic processes: a Danish survey study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024; https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.24323

Mao Z, Pepermans K, Beutels P Relating mental health, health-related quality of life and well-being in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional comparison in 14 European countries in early 2023. Public Health. 2025; 238:16-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2024.11.010

Rush CL, Brewer JR, Levey N ‘Pushed to Their Limits’. Health Care Provider Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing a Mind-Body and Activity Program for Older Adults with Chronic Pain in a Community Clinic for the Underserved. Family Community Health. 2025; 48:(1)49-56 https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000416

RESEARCH ROUNDUP

02 January 2025
Volume 36 · Issue 1

Abstract

George Winter provides an overview of recently published articles that may be of interest to practice nurses. Should you wish to look at any of the papers in more detail, a full reference is provided.

The prognosis for colorectal cancer (CRC) depends on stage at diagnosis, but although CRC screening programmes exist in many countries, the diagnoses of most CRC cases are based on symptom presentation, making it challenging for GPs.

In this questionnaire-based Danish two-year study of 187 general practices, Jarbøl et al (2024) explored CRC patients' diagnostic pathways by considering their first place of contact with the healthcare system; the influence of symptom presentations, sex and age on events in the diagnostic process; and the GPs' evaluation of the diagnostic processes.

Of 8,240 cancer patients, 1,032 (12.5%) were diagnosed with CRC. Of these, 65% had their first contact in general practice; 27% of those aged over 40 years who first presented in general practice were treated or referred on suspicion of another disease; 20% were diagnosed through screening; 10% diagnosed in hospital; and 5% diagnosed through the out-of-hours service. However, some 37% of CRC patients presented with non-specific symptoms, raising the chances of a GP advising watchful waiting. The GPs, note the authors, ‘assessed nearly one fifth of the diagnostic processes as poor’ and they conclude that most CRC patients are diagnosed with initial presentation in general practice, and that having non-specific symptoms is common and challenges timely diagnosis.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Practice Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for general practice nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month